[index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]

provenance_challenge_ipaw_info messages

Re: [provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed...

From: Joe Futrelle <futrelle AT ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:23:44 -0500


Threading: [provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed... from dholland AT eecs.harvard.edu
      • This Message

Hey Jen, have you looked at the errors in your data? I did some  
manual correction on this end but since I only use a subset of your  
data I may have missed something, so I don't want to post my correction.

On Jun 22, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Jennifer Golbeck wrote:

> Yes, we imported all the PASS data into our system and ran our  
> queries on
> it. I'm not sure we even have their most recent data - I did that
> conversion quite a while ago, and before the latest version of PASS, I
> believe.
>
> Jen
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Joe Futrelle wrote:
>
>> The MINDSWAP team claims they have run queries over your data:
>> http://twiki.ipaw.info/bin/view/Challenge/MINDSWAP2
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2007, at 8:45 PM, David Holland wrote:
>>
>>> The specification for the second challenge says
>>>
>>>     *  The following annotations:
>>>           o Anatomy Image 1, as used in the first workflow run, is
>>>             annotated with key-value pair center=UChicago.
>>>           o Anatomy Image 2, as used in the first workflow run, is
>>>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>             annotated with key-value pairs center=southampton and
>>>             studyModality=speech.
>>>
>>> but query 9, which is supposed to read the studyModality 
annotation,
>>> says
>>>
>>>    A user has annotated some atlas graphics with key-value pair
>>> where the
>>>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>    key is studyModality. Find all the graphical atlas sets that 
have
>>>    metadata annotation studyModality with values speech, visual or
>>> audio,
>>>    and return all other annotations to these files.
>>>
>>> so query 9 will always come up empty.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure why I didn't notice this until now, or why apparently
>>> nobody else has either. My excuse is that I'm still debugging our
>>> query engine... :-)
>>>
>>> But it seems problematic. It also seems like it's probably too  
>>> late to
>>> do anything about it, except perhaps to define a query 9a that 
looks
>>> at the anatomy images instead.
>>>
>>> Anyone have thoughts?
>>>
>>> And, btw, is anyone using our data?
>>>
>>> --
>>>    - David A. Holland / dholland AT eecs.harvard.edu
>>
>> --
>> Joe Futrelle
>> Digital Library Technologies, NCSA
>> http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/People/futrelle
>>
>>

--
Joe Futrelle
Digital Library Technologies, NCSA
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/People/futrelle



[index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]