[index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]

provenance_challenge_ipaw_info messages

[provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed...

From: dholland AT eecs.harvard.edu (David Holland)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:45:34 -0400 (EDT)


Threading:      • This Message
             Re: [provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed... from futrelle AT ncsa.uiuc.edu
             Re: [provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed... from golbeck AT cs.umd.edu
             Re: [provenance-challenge] Something else I just noticed... from futrelle AT ncsa.uiuc.edu
             [provenance-challenge] Sides on KOPE uploaded to the twiki from jmgomez AT isoco.com

The specification for the second challenge says

    *  The following annotations:
          o Anatomy Image 1, as used in the first workflow run, is
            annotated with key-value pair center=UChicago.
          o Anatomy Image 2, as used in the first workflow run, is
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            annotated with key-value pairs center=southampton and
            studyModality=speech.

but query 9, which is supposed to read the studyModality annotation,
says

   A user has annotated some atlas graphics with key-value pair where the
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   key is studyModality. Find all the graphical atlas sets that have
   metadata annotation studyModality with values speech, visual or audio,
   and return all other annotations to these files.

so query 9 will always come up empty.

I'm not sure why I didn't notice this until now, or why apparently
nobody else has either. My excuse is that I'm still debugging our
query engine... :-)

But it seems problematic. It also seems like it's probably too late to
do anything about it, except perhaps to define a query 9a that looks
at the anatomy images instead.

Anyone have thoughts?

And, btw, is anyone using our data?

-- 
   - David A. Holland / dholland AT eecs.harvard.edu


[index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]